11/5/1968
11/3/1970
11/7/1972
11/5/1974
11/2/1976
11/7/1978
11/4/1980
11/2/1982
11/6/1984
11/4/1986
11/8/1988
11/6/1990
11/3/1992
11/8/1994
11/5/1996
11/3/1998
11/7/2000
11/5/2002
11/2/2004
11/7/2006
11/4/2008
11/2/2010
11/6/2012
More Info:
When you spend, you may spend your own money or someone else's; and you may spend for the benefit of yourself or someone else. Combining these two pairs of alternatives gives four possibilities summarized in the following simple table.
Category I in the table refers to your spending your own money on yourself. You shop in a supermarket, for example. You clearly have a strong incentive both to economize and to get as much value as you can for each dollar you do spend.
Category II refers to your spending your own money on someone else. You shop for Christmas or birthday presents. You have the same incentive to economize as in the first case but not the same incentive to get full value for your money, at least as judged by the tastes of the recipient. You will, of course, want to get something the recipient will like--provided that it also makes the right impression and does not take too much time and effort. (If, indeed, your main objective were to enable the recipient to get as much value as possible per dollar, you would give him cash, converting your Category II spending to Category I spending by him.)
Category III refers to your spending someone else’s money on yourself--lunching on an expense account, for instance. You have no strong incentive to keep down the cost of the lunch, but you do have a strong incentive to get your money’s worth.
Category IV refers to your spending someone else’s money on still another person. You are paying for someone else’s lunch out of an expense account. You have little incentive either to economize or to try to get your guest the lunch that he will value most highly. However, if you are having lunch with him, so that the lunch is a mixture of Category III and Category IV, you do have a strong incentive to satisfy your own tastes at the sacrifice of his, if necessary.
Contest
|
Total Vote
Count 2008
|
Total Vote
Count 2012
|
Difference
2008 to 2012
|
Voter Turnout As % of
Estimated State Population
|
|||
% Change
|
2008
|
2012
|
% Diff
|
||||
Iowa Caucus
|
118,917
|
121,501
|
2,584
|
+ 2.17 %
|
3.96 %
|
3.97 %
|
+ 0.01 %
|
General Election
|
1,537,123
|
1,555,570
|
18,447
|
+ 1.20 %
|
51.19 %
|
50.80 %
|
- 0.40 %
|
Candidate
|
2008 Republican Caucus
|
2012 Republican Caucus
|
Difference
2008 to 2012
|
|||
Count
|
% of Total
|
Count
|
% of Total
|
% Change
|
||
Ron Paul
|
11,841
|
9.96 %
|
26,036
|
21.43 %
|
+ 14,195
|
+ 119.88
%
|
Mitt Romney
|
30,021
|
25.25 %
|
29,805
|
24.53 %
|
- 216
|
- 0.72
%
|
Rick Santorum
|
-
|
-
|
29,839
|
24.56 %
|
-
|
-
|
Mike Huckabee
|
40,954
|
34.44 %
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Party
|
2008 General Election
|
2012 General Election
|
Difference
2008 to 2012
|
|||
Count
|
% of Total
|
Count
|
% of Total
|
% Change
|
||
Libertarian
|
4,590
|
0.30%
|
12,759
|
0.82%
|
+ 8,169
|
+
177.97 %
|
Republican
|
682,379
|
44.39%
|
722,754
|
46.38%
|
+ 40,375
|
+ 5.92
%
|
Write-In
|
6,737
|
0.44%
|
6,840
|
0.44%
|
+ 103
|
+ 1.53
%
|
Democrat
|
828,940
|
53.93%
|
807,394
|
51.81%
|
- 21,546
|
- 2.60
%
|